«Sous le coup de la colère»: Trump met en garde Israël après une frappe en solo

Donald Trump sharply reacted to the latest escalation in the Middle East, attributing Israel’s strike on Iran’s South Pars Gas Field to what he described as an emotional response rather than a coordinated strategic move. His comments come as he faces mounting criticism over recent U.S. strikes on Iran, with questions raised about his decision-making and the risk of broader regional conflict.

In a lengthy and forceful post on Truth Social, Trump suggested that Israel acted «out of anger» following developments in the region, while simultaneously stressing that the United States had no involvement in the operation. The framing of his message appeared aimed at distancing Washington from the latest attack, as tensions continue to rise.

According to Trump, the Israeli strike targeted a portion of the South Pars Gas Field, one of the largest natural gas reserves globally and a key pillar of Iran’s energy infrastructure.

He wrote «Israel, out of anger for what has taken place in the Middle East, has violently lashed out at a major facility known as South Pars Gas Field in Iran. A relatively small section of the whole has been hit.»

The description indicates that while the damage may have been limited in scale, the symbolic and strategic implications of the strike remain significant, particularly as global markets monitor potential disruptions tied to energy supply.

Trump repeatedly emphasized that the United States had no prior knowledge of the attack and played no role in its execution, seeking to distance Washington from any perception of coordination. In the same statement, he said «The United States knew nothing about this particular attack, and the country of Qatar was in no way, shape, or form, involved with it, nor did it have any idea that it was going to happen.»

The remarks also appeared aimed at preventing further escalation involving Qatar, a major liquefied natural gas exporter with strategic importance in both regional diplomacy and global energy markets.

The statement further outlined what Trump described as a chain reaction following the strike, with Iran allegedly responding without full knowledge of the circumstances.

He wrote:

«Unfortunately, Iran did not know this, or any of the pertinent facts pertaining to the South Pars attack, and unjustifiably and unfairly attacked a portion of Qatar’s LNG Gas facility.»

This claim introduces an additional layer of tension, suggesting that retaliatory actions may already be expanding beyond the initial confrontation and drawing in other key actors in the region.

Trump’s message escalated further as he issued a direct warning regarding future developments tied to the South Pars site.

He declared «NO MORE ATTACKS WILL BE MADE BY ISRAEL pertaining to this extremely important and valuable South Pars Field unless Iran unwisely decides to attack a very innocent, in this case, Qatar – In which instance the United States of America, with or without the help or consent of Israel, will massively blow up the entirety of the South Pars Gas Field at an amount of strength and power that Iran has never seen or witnessed before.»

The language marked a significant intensification in rhetoric, outlining a potential U.S. response under specific conditions.

Despite the severity of the warning, Trump concluded by signaling reluctance to authorize such action, framing it as contingent on further escalation.

He wrote:

«I do not want to authorize this level of violence and destruction because of the long term implications that it will have on the future of Iran, but if Qatar’s LNG is again attacked, I will not hesitate to do so.»

The statement underscores the fragile and rapidly evolving nature of the crisis, as public messaging, military developments, and geopolitical tensions continue to intersect in a highly volatile environment.